refactoring-backend #3

Merged
lukas.pupkalipinski merged 403 commits from refactoring-backend into main 2026-05-20 20:23:46 +02:00
5 changed files with 163 additions and 55 deletions
Showing only changes of commit 05c3b564ae - Show all commits

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,65 @@ If fail2ban goes offline but the backend always returns 200, Docker treats the c
---
## Resource Allocation
## Scheduler Lock
In multi-instance deployments (e.g., Kubernetes, Docker Swarm), the scheduler lock prevents duplicate execution of background tasks by ensuring only one instance runs the scheduler at a time.
### How It Works
The lock is stored in the SQLite database and enforced via:
1. **Lock Acquisition** — At startup, each instance tries to insert a lock record. Only one succeeds; others reject startup with a clear error message.
2. **Heartbeat** — The lock-holding instance sends a heartbeat every 5 seconds to prove it's still alive.
3. **Stale Lock Cleanup** — On startup, any lock older than 60 seconds (without a heartbeat) is automatically deleted, allowing recovery from instance crashes.
### Configuration
| Parameter | Value | Rationale |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| **Heartbeat Interval** | 5 seconds | Allows ~12 missed heartbeats before lock expires |
| **Lock TTL** | 60 seconds | Time before a lock without heartbeat is considered abandoned |
| **Min Safe Ratio** | 12x (TTL / interval) | Robust protection against temporary delays or high load |
With a 60-second TTL and 5-second heartbeat interval, the lock survives even if the instance becomes unresponsive for up to ~55 seconds. This provides strong protection against false positives while still detecting genuine crashes.
### Monitoring
Check logs for these key events:
- `scheduler_lock_acquired` — Lock successfully acquired at startup (INFO)
- `scheduler_lock_heartbeat_updated` — Heartbeat successfully updated (DEBUG)
- `scheduler_lock_heartbeat_failed` — Heartbeat update failed; lock may be lost (WARNING)
- `scheduler_lock_heartbeat_timeout` — Heartbeat exceeded 5-second timeout (ERROR)
- `scheduler_lock_held_by_other_instance` — Another instance holds the lock (WARNING at startup)
### Troubleshooting: "Blocklist import runs twice"
**Symptom:** Blocklist import task executes simultaneously in two instances, causing duplicate entries or data corruption.
**Cause:** The scheduler lock was released prematurely (e.g., instance crash, database timeout) while a task was still running.
**Solution:**
1. **Check heartbeat timing** — Ensure the instance isn't hanging for >60 seconds (monitor CPU/memory/disk).
2. **Verify database health** — Run `SELECT * FROM scheduler_lock;` to see if a stale lock exists. If present, delete it: `DELETE FROM scheduler_lock;`
3. **Review logs** — Look for `scheduler_lock_heartbeat_failed` or `scheduler_lock_heartbeat_timeout` errors in the time window when duplication occurred.
4. **Increase resource limits** — If the backend is memory/CPU constrained, increase limits in `docker-compose.yml` to prevent slowdowns that trigger false lock timeouts.
5. **Check database performance** — Slow database queries can delay heartbeat updates. Run `PRAGMA integrity_check;` to check for corruption.
If duplication occurs frequently, consider migrating to Redis-backed locking (see Advanced section below) for higher reliability.
### Advanced: Migrating to Redis
For very high-traffic deployments with strict data consistency requirements, you can replace the SQLite-backed lock with Redis:
- **Why:** Redis is single-threaded and atomic by design; clock skew and timeout issues are eliminated.
- **How:** Install `redlock-py` or `aioredis`, replace `scheduler_lock.py` with a Redis implementation, update heartbeat interval to 2-3 seconds.
- **Trade-off:** Adds a Redis dependency but eliminates database lock contention and provides microsecond-precision atomicity.
This is not required for typical deployments but is recommended if you see frequent scheduler conflicts in logs.
---
All containers have hard limits (max usage) and soft reservations (guaranteed allocation). This ensures:
- **Isolation**: A misbehaving container cannot crash others or the host

View File

@@ -1,50 +1,3 @@
## [IMPORTANT] Database transactions lack explicit isolation
**Where found**
- `backend/app/repositories/session_repo.py:40-60` — multiple queries without `BEGIN TRANSACTION`
- Similar pattern in multi-step operations across repositories
**Why this is needed**
Without explicit boundaries, concurrent requests can race: Thread A checks if exists → not found, Thread B checks same → not found, Thread A inserts → succeeds, Thread B inserts → duplicate error or silent overwrite.
**Goal**
Wrap all multi-step operations in explicit transactions with appropriate isolation level.
**What to do**
1. Use explicit `BEGIN IMMEDIATE` transaction:
```python
await db.execute("BEGIN IMMEDIATE")
try:
await db.execute("INSERT INTO sessions ...")
await db.commit()
except Exception:
await db.rollback()
raise
```
2. Use `IMMEDIATE` mode to lock immediately for writes
3. Document transaction boundaries clearly
**Possible traps and issues**
- Nested transactions (SAVEPOINTs) may be needed
- Locks held too long cause contention
- Deadlocks possible with concurrent writers
**Docs changes needed**
- Add section in `Docs/Backend-Development.md` § Database Transactions
**Doc references**
- `Docs/Backend-Development.md` (database design)
---
## [IMPORTANT] Scheduler lock race condition
**Where found**

View File

@@ -27,8 +27,9 @@ if TYPE_CHECKING:
log: structlog.stdlib.BoundLogger = structlog.get_logger()
#: How often the heartbeat job fires (seconds). Must be less than the lock TTL.
SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL: int = 10
#: How often the heartbeat job fires (seconds). Must be significantly less than
#: the lock TTL to allow multiple missed heartbeats before lock expiry.
SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL: int = 5
#: Stable APScheduler job ID — ensures re-registration replaces, not duplicates.
JOB_ID: str = "scheduler_lock_heartbeat"
@@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ async def _update_heartbeat_with_resources(settings: Settings) -> None:
a warning but don't crash the scheduler. This allows the running
application to continue even if something went wrong.
The heartbeat must complete within TASK_TIMEOUT_SECONDS to prevent
scheduler starvation. If it exceeds this timeout, a warning is logged
and the task is cancelled.
Args:
settings: The resolved application settings used for database access.
"""
@@ -57,10 +62,24 @@ async def _update_heartbeat_with_resources(settings: Settings) -> None:
else:
log.warning(
"scheduler_lock_heartbeat_failed",
message="Failed to update heartbeat; we may have lost the lock.",
message="Failed to update heartbeat; we no longer hold the lock. "
"Another instance may have taken over or the database connection failed.",
)
await run_with_timeout("scheduler_lock_heartbeat", _do_update(), TASK_TIMEOUT_SECONDS)
try:
await run_with_timeout("scheduler_lock_heartbeat", _do_update(), TASK_TIMEOUT_SECONDS)
except TimeoutError:
log.error(
"scheduler_lock_heartbeat_timeout",
timeout_seconds=TASK_TIMEOUT_SECONDS,
message="Heartbeat update exceeded timeout. The database may be slow or unresponsive.",
)
except Exception as e:
log.error(
"scheduler_lock_heartbeat_error",
error=str(e),
message="Unexpected error during heartbeat update.",
)
async def _update_heartbeat(app: FastAPI) -> None:

View File

@@ -51,11 +51,16 @@ log: structlog.stdlib.BoundLogger = structlog.get_logger()
# Lock record expires if heartbeat hasn't been updated for this many seconds.
# This prevents stale locks from a crashed instance from blocking new startups.
# Set conservatively to allow temporary delays (e.g., high load) before considering
# the lock abandoned.
SCHEDULER_LOCK_TTL_SECONDS: int = 60
# Heartbeat interval: how often to update the lock's heartbeat_at timestamp.
# Must be less than TTL to prevent premature expiration.
SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL_SECONDS: int = 10
# Must be significantly less than TTL (at least 3-4x smaller) to allow multiple
# consecutive missed heartbeats before the lock is considered stale.
# With TTL=60s and interval=5s, the lock survives ~12 missed heartbeats before
# expiring, providing robust protection against temporary delays.
SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL_SECONDS: int = 5
async def init_scheduler_lock_table(db: aiosqlite.Connection) -> None:

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
These tests verify that the database-backed scheduler lock correctly enforces
single-executor safety across multiple startup attempts, including stale lock
cleanup and heartbeat updates.
cleanup, heartbeat updates, and multi-process race condition prevention.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ import aiosqlite
import pytest
from app.utils.scheduler_lock import (
SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL_SECONDS,
SCHEDULER_LOCK_TTL_SECONDS,
acquire_scheduler_lock,
get_scheduler_lock_info,
@@ -220,3 +221,75 @@ async def test_scheduler_lock_full_lifecycle(
await release_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
info = await get_scheduler_lock_info(lock_db)
assert info is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_scheduler_lock_heartbeat_interval_sanity(
lock_db: aiosqlite.Connection,
) -> None:
"""Verify heartbeat interval is less than TTL to prevent premature expiry.
With a 5-second heartbeat interval and 60-second TTL, the lock can survive
~12 missed heartbeats before expiring. This provides robust protection against
temporary delays or high load that could cause a single missed heartbeat.
"""
# Verify the configuration ratio is safe (interval < TTL)
assert SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL_SECONDS < SCHEDULER_LOCK_TTL_SECONDS
# With this ratio, the lock can survive at least 12 missed heartbeats
# (60s TTL / 5s interval = 12 intervals between heartbeats before expiry)
safe_ratio = SCHEDULER_LOCK_TTL_SECONDS / SCHEDULER_LOCK_HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL_SECONDS
assert safe_ratio >= 12, (
f"Heartbeat interval too long: lock can only survive {safe_ratio:.1f} missed heartbeats. "
f"Should be at least 12 for safety."
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_scheduler_lock_race_condition_prevention(
lock_db: aiosqlite.Connection,
) -> None:
"""Test that the lock prevents concurrent execution (race condition).
Scenario: Process A acquires the lock and starts working. Process B starts
up and tries to acquire the lock. Even if Process A's heartbeat fails
momentarily, Process B should not acquire the lock immediately.
This test verifies:
1. Only one process can hold the lock at a time
2. The lock cannot be stolen while being actively maintained (via heartbeat)
3. Stale locks are only cleaned after TTL expires
"""
# Process A acquires the lock
result_a = await acquire_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
assert result_a is True
# Get the lock info
info_a = await get_scheduler_lock_info(lock_db)
assert info_a is not None
lock_heartbeat_a = info_a["heartbeat_at"]
# Process B tries to acquire — should fail
result_b = await acquire_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
assert result_b is False
# Process A updates its heartbeat (simulating ongoing work)
time.sleep(0.01)
result_heartbeat = await update_scheduler_lock_heartbeat(lock_db)
assert result_heartbeat is True
# Verify heartbeat was updated
info_a_updated = await get_scheduler_lock_info(lock_db)
assert info_a_updated is not None
assert info_a_updated["heartbeat_at"] > lock_heartbeat_a
# Process B still cannot acquire the lock (it's active and well-maintained)
result_b_retry = await acquire_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
assert result_b_retry is False
# Process A releases the lock
await release_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
# Now Process B can acquire it
result_b_final = await acquire_scheduler_lock(lock_db)
assert result_b_final is True